UNC HeaderMCB Header

BAAC 325: Tax I
Spring 2008

Dr. Richard Newmark

Tax Research

 
 

Last Updated 04/11/2008 3:58 PM

 
RIA Checkpoint
overview preparer-reviewer guidelines add'l R&A reviewer guidelines client letter
Post research memo this weekend, preferrably on Saturday, April 12.
Specific instructions added to Reviewer Guidelines (link is right above).

Overview

The research cases involve relevant tax issues covering a variety of circumstances (e.g., tax compliance, tax planning) and taxpayers (e.g., individuals, corporations, partnerships).  The first two assignments will require you to write a tax research memo and provide review comments on the research memos prepared by the other groups. The third assignment will require you to write a client letter. The fourth assignment will require you to complete a tax return for a C corporation (Form 1120), and the fifth assignment requires you to complete an individual tax return (Form 1040).

The tax research memo is the most popular form of formally communicating the results of your research with other professionals.  A tax research memo is a thorough, but concise summary your tax research. 

Even though a tax professional is a client advocate, a tax research memo must be objective.  You should look for ways to support a pro-client position, but you CANNOT let your client advocacy affect your conclusions.  A tax research memo is used to evaluate a particular set of facts (like a Private Letter Ruling). 


-Top-

Preparer and Reviewer Guidelines

As Preparer, you will:

  • Research your case (individually), identifying issue(s) and determining the advice you will give to your client, properly supported by a combination of the authority you find in your research and your own reasoning. Use the writing/reviewing guidelines below--the reviewer will use these in evaluating your research!
  • Prepare a research memorandum of your research using the format specified by the professor (it is slightly different that the format presented in the textbook) and for practicing CPAs, it may be different that the format you are accustomed to using at work.
  • E-mail your memorandum to richard.newmark@unco.edu on or before the specified due date and time.
  • Post your memorandum to the appropriate discussion forum(see BlackBoard) during the specified time frame (not early or late ["Late" assignments are not acceptable in tax practice or in this course]). Late assignments will receive zero points.
  • Once the review period is complete, you may be asked to prepare a letter to the client, which is to be emailed to richard.newmark@unco.edu on or before the specified due date and time. The client letter should reflect the review comments posted. (Try not to be defensive about the review comments. Carefully consider suggestions and implement those that have merit.) The client letter often requires additional research as a result of the review comments. It is also essential that you anticipate client questions in preparing the client letter.

As Reviewer, you will:

  • Familiarize yourself with the writing/review guidelines below-you will use these guidelines in reviewing the research of others (and for your own research).
  • For each tax research assignment, you will post 3 review comments:
    • Review comments will be between 75-100 words per comment (I will stop reading after the 100th word).
    • At least one review comment must address the issues section of a memorandum.
    • At least one review comment must pertain to the reasoning and authority (R&A) section of a memorandum.
    • At least one review comment must be a positive comment. You should state what was done correctly/well in sufficient detail (e.g., "the facts section was excellent" is not sufficient).
    • Posting may be either original review comments OR responses to the review comments of others (e.g., disagreeing with a comment or expanding upon it).
    • All postings must be professional, constructive criticism. (For example, it is not acceptable to simply say "this is bad" or that a particular element of a memo is unclear. You must offer specific suggestions for improvement. If you wish, you may even offer specific case citations that might offer the researcher additional authority for the case or wording that might make an explanation more clear. Be helpful!).
    • You may comment on any memo(s) you choose.


-Top-